Petey's
Pipeline E-zine
Issue #45
February 5, 2007
Contents
Business
First Hidden
Benefits
Random Ramblings & Miscellaneous Musings
National SecuritySafe
or Sorry: Food Security
(Part IV)
Write Thinking Punctuation
the Marks of Professionals (Parentheses)
Business
First (Editorial)
Hidden
Benefits
Sometimes,
when disaster strikes and bad things happen, we're so focused
on the disaster aspect of the situation that we fail to recognize
any good that it may contain. Oh, yes, even the darkest clouds
often have silver linings.
The
recent influx of Arctic air, and the accompanying snowfall,
across much of the nation had some unexpected—but entirely welcome—benefits.
Two weeks ago, when snowstorms bogged down much of the Pacific
Northwest and vast areas of the South, a curious thing happened;
the amount of unsolicited commercial e-mail that reaches my
various "in" boxes on any given day dropped by about
half.
A
week later, the Pacific Northwest was back to normal (that is
to say, no more screwed up than usual), but the South still
had its weather-related problems, some of which manifested as
power outages. And that, my friends, brings us to the silver
lining.
Power
outages that coincide with a decrease, by half, in spam tell
me exactly what region of the country half the spam is coming
from. Although I hate to think that people sat huddled and shivering
in the dark, it pleased me no end that a few prolific spammers
had the opportunity to feel the same level of frustration I
feel when I'm on the receiving end of their spam.
• • •
For
an occasional dose of insight and opinion, read Petey's
Pipeline Blog.
You're
invited to comment on e-zine articles or Petey's Pipeline Blog
postings at any time. Whether you agree or disagree, your thoughtful,
carefully considered comments are welcome. However, anything
suggestive of a temper tantrum, psychotic episode or hysteria
will be deleted.
Address
article comments to the editor.
Send your blog comments c/o
Petey.
Running
a spelling check on your text before posting comments is strongly
encouraged. Perfect Text, Petey's Pipeline E-zine and Petey's
Pipeline Blog exist, in part, to make all of us better writers.
Let's not defeat that purpose by being hasty or becoming careless.
Random
Ramblings & Miscellaneous Musings
National
SecuritySafe or Sorry: Food
Security (Part IV)
by Phil Hanson
Getting
Back to Basics
The
threat to national food security has its roots in our collective
inability to come to terms with the word "finite."
We persist in our misguided (and unfounded) belief that the
American Dream can last forever, contrary to reality's harsh
lessons of the recent past, oblivious to the harsher lessons
yet to come. And though the situation isn't hopeless, yet, it
will become so, soon, if Americans fail to embrace new paradigms
for sustainability.
Where
to begin? The first step in solving a problem is to admit that
there is a problem. From that point on, charting a course
that leads to a solution is relatively easy. Food security is
no exception. That's not to say, however, that maintaining food
security for 300 million people (6.5 billion, globally) is without
difficulties.
A
major threat to food security is overpopulation, which drives
demands for more energy and more food, at a time when energy
use is responsible for global climate change, which in turn
inhibits food production. Cause and effect compound the problems
and put easy solutions to those problems out of reach.
Any
effort to minimize the threat to food security must begin with
a firm commitment to halt population growth and reduce population
numbers. More people means more demand for dwindling resources.
We can choose to limitor even reversepopulation
growth by changing our nation's immigration policies, and by
implementing a one-child-per-family policy. This is preferable
to allowing wars or a series of natural disasters to decimate
the population.
Next
on our list of critical strategies for ensuring food security
is to tackle the problem of global warming. What? You still
don't believe that human activities cause global warming? Then
look at some hard evidence.
A
consortium of 2500 climate scientists from 130 countries, known
collectively as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
released a summary of its long-awaited report on global climate
change on Friday. In it, they claim with more than 90% certainty
that human activities are responsible for global warming. They
cite the following statistics as corroborating evidence:
The atmospheric content of carbon dioxide and methane (greenhouse
gasses) are at their highest levels in 650,000 years. Most of
the increase has taken place since the beginning of the industrial
age (1750).
Glaciers, and snow cover, are declining worldwide.
Global sea level has risen about 8 inches since 1900.
Eleven of the past 12 years are among the warmest years
recorded since 1850.
Must
you starve, or drown, to be convinced?
You
can help reduce the demand for resources, particularly energy,
by downsizing your lifestyle. Choose to live in a smaller, more
energy-efficient house or apartment, preferably as close to
your place of employment as you can get. Work at home, if possible.
Drive less. Walk more, ride a bike, or use public transportation
when these options are feasible. Become an activist for sustainable
living. Be an advocate of renewable energy. In everything you
do, strive to reduce the size of your carbon "footprint."
Patronize
local farmers that are committed to sustainable agriculture.
Support organically grown food, farmer's markets, CSAs (community-supported
agriculture), and local producers and processors. Reduce your
consumption of meat to the greatest extent possible.
Yes,
I know that locally produced organic food is a little more expensive
than the stuff that's shipped across the country—or from
halfway around the world. Just think of the additional cost
as insurance against the day when oil runs out and shipping
food long distances no longer makes sense (not that it ever
did). Supporting local food producers now will help ensure your
access to food, later.
Buy
fresh fruit and vegetables in bulk and do your own processing.
You'll need a good pressure cooker/canner, and an ample supply
of canning jars, lids and rings. An initial outlay might set
you back a couple of hundred bucks, but everything but the lids
are reusable, so you can expect to recoup your investment in
a couple of seasons, providing you do a substantial amount of
canning.
Yes,
home canning is a time consuming, work intensive activity. To
lessen the burden, make canning a family activity that's both
educational and entertaining. A couple of weeks spent at the
end of harvest season will provide you and your family with
enough fruit, vegetables, jams, jellies and relish to last you
until the next canning season. And the nutritional and associated
health benefits are their own rewards.
In
addition to canning bulk purchases, grow some or all of your
own food. Have extra yard space? Consider dedicating part of
it to a garden. No room for a garden but room enough to set
out some large flower pots (6-gallon, or larger)? These are
great for growing tomato plants, bell peppers, bush beans, radishes,
or strawberries. If you have flowers growing in border areas
of your yard, consider replacing some of them with ever-bearing
raspberries and/or a grape arbor. You can grow many herbs and
spices in smaller containers, placing them in strategic locations
to capture the optimum amount of sunlight.
Many
plants we now call nuisances have nutritional value, among them
dandelions and plantain. If we learn to recognize which common
weeds are edible, now, we may be able to avoid a slow, painful
death by starvation, later.
Much
needs to be done as we strive to design—and learn how to live
in—a sustainable culture. Population control, environmental
protection, renewable energy resources, and food and water security
are paramount; these are our greatest challenges. But if we
can get a handle on these things, most other problems will resolve
themselves.
A
few of us working alone will not get the job done. All of us
working together will. We were warned more than 35 years ago,
but we chose to ignore the warnings. Now, we no longer have
that option. We don't have another 35 years in which to carry
on business as usual. Now, we must act, or risk losing everything.
Related articles:
Coming in issue #46: Combating Terrorism
Copyright
© 2007 by Phil Hanson
All rights reserved.
Write
Thinking
Punctuation – the Marks of Professionals
Getting
punctuation right is critical to making your writing intelligible
and coherent. As with misspelled and misused words, misused
or missing punctuation takes your message off track and confuses
your readers. To help you avoid the avoidable, the next few
installments of Write Thinking deal with punctuation
marks, in all their many forms, with example sentences provided
for clarification.
Parentheses
( )
Information
contained within parentheses can be said to be less relevant
or nonessential when compared to the information contained in
the main statement.
Parentheses are used to isolate supplementary material (words,
phrases, clauses, or complete sentences) that, when inserted
into a main statement, describe, explain or otherwise clarify
the main statement without making the supplementary material
part of the main statement.
The
FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), the CIA (Central
Intelligence Agency), and the NSA (National Security
Agency) operate under the umbrella of the DHS (Department
of Homeland Security).
The Audi R-10 proved to be fast and reliable (1st place in
each of its first four races), guaranteeing a solid future
for diesel engines in motorsports.
Parentheses also enclose numbers or letters that are used to
list items in a series.
The
Presidential candidate listed as his top concerns (1)
environment, (2) energy independence, and (3)
economic sustainability.
If material contained within parentheses needs additional clarification,
enclose that material using brackets within the parentheses.
Never use parentheses within parentheses.
If the material contained within the parentheses is a complete
sentence, capitalize the first word; place the punctuation mark
inside the closing parenthesis when it applies exclusively to
the parenthetical material.
The
controlled demolition of precisely placed explosives brought
down the Trojan nuclear plant's cooling tower in about eight
seconds. (See additional photos on page 11.)
*
If the punctuation mark is part of the entire sentence and not
exclusive to the parenthetical material, place it outside the
closing parenthesis (just as I have done, here).
Copyright
© 2007 by Phil Hanson
All rights reserved.
Disclaimer
The
articles appearing in Petey's Pipeline E-zine are based on information
believed to be true at the time of publication.
Neither Perfecttext.com, Petey's Pipeline E-zine nor their publisher
assume any liability or responsibility as to the accuracy or
efficacy of any information, products or services that are submitted,
advertised or rendered by contributors to Petey's Pipeline E-zine.
While we make every effort to screen out scam artists and bogus
offers, you should still do your homework. Caveat emptor!
|